Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Publications

Use the filters below to narrow publications by offices, programs or categories

Displaying 1351 - 1360 of 1696

ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES: A Review of the Exceptions to the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act

June 30, 2003
Abstract

Executive Summary

The United States has rapidly become a society where access to information plays a dominant role in the economic and social progress of daily life. Along with the telephone, the computer and the Internet are the primary tools used to communicate in a fast-paced and quickly changing society. Americans use the Internet for numerous reasons, including to complete business transactions, conduct research, collect health, life and automobile insurance information, and to receive interest rate information and quotes for home mortgages. This report, Electronic Signatures: A Review of the Exceptions to the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, contains a detailed review of the nine exceptions to the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN or Act), an examination of how the exceptions are handled in electronic commercial and personal transactions, and recommendations regarding whether each exception should remain in the Act for the protection of consumers. The ESIGN Act facilitates the use of electronic records and signatures in interstate and foreign commerce and grants legal validity and enforceability to electronic signatures, contracts, and records. This general rule of validity does not apply, however, to the nine exceptions provided at section 103 of the Act.(1)

The information and data gathered regarding the ESIGN exceptions demonstrate that some industry and consumer interactions using computers and the Internet have become quite routine since the passage of ESIGN. In these areas, procedures designed to protect consumers also have developed in accordance with ESIGN's consumer protection provisions. With regard to areas involving highly personal matters, however, protective mechanisms have not evolved rapidly. As a result, consumers have less confidence in computer technology and continue to rely on written documentation of business and financial transactions. In summary, this evaluation reveals the following:

  • Federal and state courts, the insurance and health industries, and the commercial and financial services industries have made significant advancements in developing optional electronic filing and information systems and the respective consumer groups have adapted to electronic filing and purchasing systems.

  • Governmental agencies with oversight for recall information and manufacturers have found electronic mail a useful tool in contacting consumers for product recalls.

  • ESIGN exceptions involving highly personal or financial interests, such as mortgage foreclosures and domestic law areas, are matters that may be unsuited to electronic information or access systems at this time. Consumer privacy interests and the high risk of loss or damage to personal interests as the result of a failure to receive required information in a timely manner causes consumers to rely on paper documentation and makes the electronic transfer of information unsuitable in some cases.

  • The nature of hazardous waste and dangerous substances management requires that written documentation accompany shipments, even though a portion of the documentation process may be accomplished through electronic means.

  • Overall, consumers, government, and industry leaders appear to prefer the option of electronic transactions accompanied by the reliability of paper documentation for some matters.


In Electronic Signatures: A Review of the Exceptions to the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, we are pleased to report that there has been significant progress in the use of electronic signatures since Congress passed ESIGN. There are, however, hurdles to overcome related to the lack of consumer confidence in electronic media as the sole method of conducting all business, financial, and personal transactions. This evaluation provides a review of the response to the exceptions to the ESIGN Act by federal and state agencies, private industry, and consumer groups and associations. This evaluation also presents an analysis of whether the exceptions to the Act are necessary to protect consumers in light of the current use of electronic signatures in the United States. In summary, the evaluation recommends that Congress retain the nine exceptions, with modifications to the utility cancellation notices exception to allow utility companies to send electronic cancellation notices to customers voluntarily enrolled in electronic billing services, and to the exception regarding contracts governed by the Uniform Commercial Code, to remove electronic letter of credit transactional records governed by Article 5 and electronic notices governed by Article 6 from the list of exceptions to the Act.

NTIA Letter Re: International Settlements Policy Reform and International Settlement Rates

August 5, 2003
IB Docket No. 02-324, IB Docket No. 96-261

The Honorable Michael K. Powell
Chairman
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554

Re:  International Settlements Policy Reform, IB Docket No. 02-324, International Settlement Rates, IB Docket No. 96-261, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC No. 02-285 (released Oct. 11, 2002)

Dear Chairman Powell:

NTIA letter to Register of Copyrights regarding DMCA

August 11, 2003
As a matter of policy established by Congress, among other objectives, NTIA seeks to promote "the benefits of technological development in the United States for all users of telecommunications and information facilities.

Joint letter to the ENUM Forum

August 13, 2003

NTIA, the State Department and the Federal Communications Commission sent a joint letter to the ENUM Forum (.pdf file) supporting an industry-based mechanism for implementing ENUM in the U.S.

NTIA comments and a request for clarification in the Narrowbanding Order proceeding

August 13, 2003
WT Docket No. 99-87, RM-9332

Before the
Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C.  20554

In the Matter of
Implementation of Sections 309(j) and 337 WT Docket No. 99-87
of the Communications Act of 1934
as Amended

Promotion of Spectrum EfficientRM-9332
Technologies on Certain Part 90
Frequencies

REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION AND RECONSIDERATION

NTIA Comments on Carrier Current Systems, including Broadband over Power Line Systems

August 13, 2003
ET Docket No. 03-104

NTIA believes that Broadband over Power Line (BPL) holds great promise as a new source of innovation and competition in the broadband marketplace.  It has the potential to open new avenues of Internet access, to enable new and expanded services for utility companies, and to create a new platform for further advances in communications technology.  By moving swiftly to examine BPL and to establish appropriate rules for its use, the Commission can provide this emerging industry with a solid foundation upon which to build new services and products that w

Children's Internet Protection Act, Pub. L. 106-554, Study of Technology Protection Measures in Section 1703

August 15, 2003
Abstract

NTIA released a report pursuant to section 1703 of the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA), Pub.L.No. 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-336 (2000), evaluating the effectiveness of technology protection measures and safety policies used by educational institutions. The Act requested NTIA to evaluate whether the currently available Internet blocking or filtering technology protection measures and Internet safety policies adequately address the needs of educational institutions. CIPA also invited NTIA’s recommendations to Congress on how to foster the development of technology protection measures that meet these needs. NTIA’s report concludes that the currently available technology measures have the capacity to meet most of the needs and concerns of educational institutions and makes the following recommendations: 1) technology vendors should offer training services to educational institutions on specific features of their products; and 2) expand CIPA’s definition of “technology protection measures” to include additional technologies in order to encompass a wider array of technological measures to protect children from inappropriate content.